Behind Closed Doors: Jack Smith Defends Trump Investigations ⚡ What lawmakers heard 👇

Behind Closed Doors: Jack Smith Defends Trump Investigations
⚡ What lawmakers heard 👇<

Here’s a news-style article based on what lawmakers heard in the behind-closed-doors appearance by former Special Counsel Jack Smith defending his investigations of President Donald Trump:

**Behind Closed Doors: Jack Smith Defends Trump Investigations
⚡ What Lawmakers Heard**

Former Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith spent more than eight hours this month testifying privately before the House Judiciary Committee, offering a detailed defense of the controversial federal investigations he once led into President Donald Trump’s conduct.

A Prosecutor’s Defense: ‘Facts and the Law’
At the heart of Smith’s closed-door appearance — secured under subpoena by Republican Chair Rep. Jim Jordan — was a firm rebuttal to criticism that his work was politically motivated. Smith repeatedly told lawmakers that he made all prosecutorial decisions “without regard to President Trump’s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election,” underscoring that his team acted based on evidence and law, not politics.

Smith’s testimony focused on the two major federal investigations he oversaw:

The 2020 Election and January 6 Probe: Smith said investigators developed proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election results.

Classified Documents Case: He also asserted that his team had “powerful evidence” that Trump willfully kept highly classified documents after leaving office and then obstructed efforts to recover them.

Smith stressed that the basis for both sets of charges “rests entirely with President Trump and his actions,” and that he would make the same charging decisions regardless of the party of the individual involved if presented with the same facts today.

What Lawmakers Asked — and What They Heard
While the questions from lawmakers remain private, released transcripts and excerpts show several key themes:

🧑‍⚖️ Evidence and Legal Thresholds

Smith was clear that his team believed the evidence met the high legal standard needed for prosecution. He argued — countering Republican criticism — that the cases were not weak or speculative but grounded in law and prosecutorial ethics.

🧨 January 6 Accountability

On the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Smith told lawmakers the riot "does not happen" without Trump’s actions — calling Trump “the most culpable and most responsible person” in the broader conspiracy to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

📞 Phone Records and Investigative Tactics

Republicans pressed questions about investigative decisions — including obtaining phone toll records related to calls Trump allies made to members of Congress around Jan. 6. Smith defended those steps as lawful and relevant to establishing how efforts

A network error occurred. Please check your connection and try again. If this issue persists please contact us through our help center at help.openai.com.