NEWS
Shocking – Epstein’s sinister note to sex predator Larry Nassar days before his suicide: ‘Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls’
A newly released document from the latest batch of unsealed Jeffrey Epstein files has ignited fresh controversy after appearing to reference former U.S. President Donald Trump in connection with inappropriate comments about underage girls.
The document, which surfaced overnight as part of a broader government transparency release, is described as a handwritten letter allegedly authored by Epstein and addressed to convicted abuser Larry Nassar in 2019. The letter contains disturbing language and includes a claim that “our president” shared similar predatory interests.
At the time the letter was dated, Donald Trump was the sitting president of the United States.
What the Document Claims
According to the released material, the letter was written while both Epstein and Nassar were facing serious criminal consequences. In the note, Epstein allegedly makes crude remarks about power, impunity, and shared behavior among elite men, including a reference to “our president.”
The document does not explicitly name Donald Trump, but the timing has led many to interpret the reference as pointing to him. The language used in the letter has been widely condemned as disturbing and inappropriate.
Important Context and Caveats
Authorities and legal experts have urged caution in interpreting the document:
- The letter is unverified and has not been authenticated by an independent forensic review
- It appears in a collection of raw materials that include rumors, claims, and untested statements
- No court has ruled that the statement is factual
- The document itself does not provide evidence of criminal conduct by Trump
Government officials have emphasized that the release of such files does not imply the accuracy of every claim contained within them. Many documents were never used in prosecutions and were not substantiated during investigations.
Trump and Epstein: What Is Known
Donald Trump has acknowledged knowing Epstein socially decades ago but has repeatedly stated that he severed ties with him long before Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Trump has denied any involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities and has never been charged in connection with the Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell cases.
No legal finding has linked Trump to Epstein’s trafficking or abuse operation.
Why the Letter Is Drawing Attention
The document has drawn intense scrutiny because it combines three highly sensitive elements:
- Epstein’s proven history of abuse
- Larry Nassar’s confirmed crimes
- A reference to the sitting U.S. president at the time
For critics, the letter raises troubling questions about how Epstein viewed his relationships with powerful figures. For others, it is seen as an example of Epstein’s tendency to exaggerate his influence and associations.
Investigators have long noted that Epstein frequently boasted about connections to powerful people, often without evidence.
The Broader Issue With Document Dumps
The release highlights a recurring challenge with mass document disclosures: transparency without context can fuel speculation and misinformation. While releasing records serves the public interest, raw documents can include false claims, exaggerations, or statements never verified by investigators.
Legal analysts stress that documents must be weighed against corroborated evidence, sworn testimony, and court findings — not interpreted in isolation.
Final Thoughts
The newly released Epstein document has reignited debate over elite accountability, media responsibility, and the dangers of conflating allegations with proven facts.
While the letter’s language is deeply disturbing, its existence alone does not establish guilt or criminal involvement by any individual named or implied. What it does underscore is the toxic culture of power and entitlement that allowed abuse to flourish unchecked for years.
As more files continue to be reviewed, responsible reporting, careful verification, and a focus on confirmed facts — and on victims — remain essential.
